Chasing a squirrel

Sonet distributionA squirrel![1] I find a lot of them while researching and I am sure all other researchers find them, too: those pieces of information that have nothing to do with what you are researching. You come across them by accident and they pull your attention away from what you are trying to find because they are equally or sometimes more interesting.  Sometimes it is a quick tangent – and sometimes squirrels can lead to an entirely new path of research that sticks with you for a long time.

My most recent squirrel diverted me while I was searching Plymouth County, Massachusetts probate records. While going through the index I spotted a notation for a record dating to 1719 which indicated that the person was “Indian.” I have always had an interest in American Indian history, and this seemed like an early probate for someone identified as being American Indian, so I just had to learn more.

The record was a division of the estate of Samuel Sonet.[2] His land was divided into six lots, and the decree gives the names of his five children, each of whom inherited one of the lots. I then searched the Massachusetts Vital Records before 1850 database on and located some vital records for the family, which also indicated that they were American Indian. The marriage records I found provided some other related surnames. Before I knew it, I was creating a family tree for an early eighteenth-century Native family in Plymouth, Massachusetts.

I then became curious about how many other records we might have – on the variety of databases available through – that would indicate individuals were American Indian. After testing out a few search options, I discovered that searching for the term “Indian” in the “Keyword” search or the “Surname” search would yield results, since often the term “Indian” was used as a surname if individuals were Native. Using an advanced search option, you can then limit results to specific geographic locations, periods of time, or in specific collections.

Of course, the searches do not include records where the term “Indian” was not prominent in the person’s name or evident from the cover pages of the document. However, this type of search is a good starting point if you are trying to identify American Indian families in our collections. Perhaps as more documents concerning American Indians are identified, the search results will include even those records where the fact that they concern Natives is not as evident. The best part is that the results usually contain clues that can lead you to more relatives and others that may be American Indian.

In Research Services we often have clients asking us to find their American Indian ancestors. While this approach is working in the opposite direction (tracing families forward instead of back), it may help to identify American Indians in a particular region and time that could be related to an individual’s potential Indian ancestors. The only danger with this approach to research is it is more likely to send you down another path, chasing another squirrel, to some fascinating family stories.


[1] See the Disney/Pixar film Up (2009).

[2] Samuel Sonet (Indian), division of estate (25 July 1719), Plymouth County, Massachusetts Probate Records, Volume 4, Page 182. As found on

About Meaghan E.H. Siekman

Meaghan holds a Ph.D. in history from Arizona State University where her focus was public history and American Indian history. She earned her B.A. in history from Union College in Schenectady, New York, the city where she grew up. Prior to joining the NEHGS team, Meaghan worked as the Curator of the Fairbanks House in Dedham, Massachusetts, as an archivist at the Heard Museum Library in Phoenix, Arizona, and wrote a number of National Register Nominations and Cultural Landscape Inventories for the National Park Service. Meaghan is passionate about connecting people with the past in meaningful and lasting ways. She enjoys finding interesting anecdotes about an ancestor to help bring the past to life.

7 thoughts on “Chasing a squirrel

  1. Timely post. Just last week “squirrels” literally drew me away from my research. I was reading old newspapers from northern NY. I found an article about a squirrel hunt in October 1894. It was a one day hunt. Two teams of men competed to kill the most squirrels. One team of 10 men killed 13,870, the other team of 9 men killed 11,640. The losing team paid for dinner for the winners. Of course, after reading this I had lots more questions. I found this small town had annual hunts up to at least the 1930’s. Lots of other towns had hunts also. I couldn’t believe the numbers of “kills”.

    1. Carole,

      Didn’t they have squirrel stew for dinner after the hunt? I understand that in the South that’s considered quite a delicacy. Apparently the New Yorkers considered the squirrels a pest to be eradicated via the annual hunt. But many of the squirrels must have outfoxed them, and lived to breed again another day. Interesting squirrel story tagged on to Meaghan’s interesting squirrel story.


      1. I actually found menus for a couple of the dinners. No squirrel was eaten! I also found an article written in the 1960’s that said squirrel was the number one game animal shot in New York State.

          1. At the time I was only reading papers from St. Lawrence County. Lisbon had hunts for many years. Waddington, did also. I had to stop reading the articles. I needed to get back to my real research. My 3 sons aren’t terribly interested in what I find but were fascinated by the squirrel hunt stories.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.