Between the dawn and the daylight, while the Keurig was doing its “wackadoo wackadoo wackadoo” thing brewing my morning coffee carafe, I read an article about how climate change is affecting current agricultural practices. This was nothing new to me because I’d seen changes in some of those practices as I grew up. One aspect of researching family histories is the temptation and ability to look back and compare what was to what is. I once asked my paternal grandmother (Winifred Church, 1884–1980) how she felt about all the history she had seen in her lifetime (covered wagons and farming on the Kansas prairie to men on the moon). She just laughed and didn’t answer! But I not only live in the area where most of my family history takes place, I live in that history on the land my ancestors farmed, so I thought about the similarities and changes in our farm equipment. This was a job for the Squirrel Bins, and they quickly reminded me about all the “farm photos” I still have!
The farming methods used by my family probably hadn’t changed much between the late 18th century and the early 20th century.
The farming methods used by my family probably hadn’t changed much between the late 18th century and the early 20th century when my paternal grandfather Rex O. Church (1883–1956) ran a dairy farm and became a John Deere Agricultural Implements dealer.
Not one to abandon old ways, however, he mixed old and new technologies perhaps without considering the theories behind his methods. For instance, he and his father and grandfathers always did the haying in one field, then waited “to see what the weather would do” before moving on to hay the next field, instead of listening to the weather reports on the radio so that they could keep on “making hay while the sun shined.” Of course, they were using the old weather-prediction methods farmers used before radios arrived (watch the sky, watch the cows, watch the trees, etc.). Therefore, haying one crop on the entire farm property could take all summer in the days before automated hay balers, powerful tractors, and motorized hay loaders. It became more tradition than efficient, and they maintained that method even after they purchased the newest equipment. While my Federal Meat Inspector father worked in Boston during the week, my brother would do the haying using his ideas. The year he finished haying all the fields in two weeks had Dad spluttering in frustration with little to say against it.
Horse-drawn farm equipment was the norm for my early Maine ancestors, and even into the 1920s my grandfather would use horses as well as his Fordson tractor (it ran the saw when he cut lumber for the new barn) and later the John Deere Model D tractor with the steel wheels. The body lasted longer than the engine did; it was a “garden decoration” in the 1950s!
Perhaps snow removal techniques are the methods that have changed the most.
As they say, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Longevity runs in this family, even down to our equipment: the 1970/71 IH 444 (which replaced a 1947 Ford 8N) lasted until it was sold in 2015. Perhaps snow removal techniques are the methods that have changed the most, from the horse-drawn snow rollers to a bulldozer and current-day snowplows.
Some equipment, however, belongs to practices so long out of use that we’ve forgotten what they were for.
Some equipment, however, belongs to practices so long out of use that we’ve forgotten what they were for. The “What Is It” is a tool found in My Old House next to a very old cheese press. While it looks like some sort of drill, none of the parts move, nor does it seem they were ever meant to turn. Maybe I’ll think on that while I wackadoo another cup of coffee. . . .
Your grandmother lived to 116?! Some very good genes, there!
Fascinating article. But did Winifred really live 116 years? Wow!
… Carry on
I love your Maine stories, which remind me of my Maine stepfather and his farming stories. One small point – I doubt that your grandmother was 116 when she died. I found an earlier article where you say her dates were 1884-1980, which sounds more realistic, though still a good old age, as they say.
Great, as usual!
Thanks, Jane, as always!
But did that crank move once upon a time?
Excellent article…would be a good one to ‘share’ with groups working the Midwest and generating a discussion about farming methods of yesteryear vs today.
Dear Everyone: Oops, a typo! Y’all are right, Winifred died in 1980, not in 2000, a really good long life (her daughter Pauline died in 2000). As for the “What Is It” tool, close inspection indicated none of the parts ever moved. I’ve often wondered if it’s a tool that was never finished by its maker, leaving it forever immobile.
The death date in the post has been corrected to 1980.
I love seeing the old farm equipment ads in vintage newspapers. It gives me insight into my Kansas farming ancestors and how they worked.