When researching a family name, one of the elements that most researchers seek is the family’s “coat of arms.” While the term coat of arms is often used to describe the inherited emblem of a family awarded to ancestors and carried on by descendants, this term only refers to the design on the shield (known as an Escutcheon). The complete display of heraldic components is known as a heraldic achievement.
The first detected use of a heraldic symbol appeared in 1127, when King Henry I of England knighted his son-in-law Geoffrey V, Count of Anjou. Upon knighting Geoffrey V, contemporary accounts record that Henry I placed a shield painted with golden lions on Geoffrey’s neck.[1] In 1484, King Richard III established the College of Arms, which still operates today, to act as an authority in the awarding of arms.[2] In the Middle Ages, heraldic symbols were used to differentiate between individuals within a jurisdiction. Throughout that period and into the modern era, heraldic symbols have continued to represent individuals and their connections to their ancestors.
The components of a complete heraldic achievement include:[3]
- The Escutcheon – the shield, the focal point of the achievement
- The Crest – the symbol on the top of the achievement, usually worn on top of a helmet
- The Torse, or Wreath – sometimes appears as a twisted piece of fabric below the crest
- The Mantling – the drapery tied to the helmet above the shield
- The Helm/Helmet – often varies by rank or social status
- The Coronet – a small crown
- Supporters – small figures often holding upon the shield
- Motto – if possessed by bearer
- Badge – if possessed by bearer
- Order – if possessed by bearer
The shape of the Escutcheon varied by region and over time.[4] On the Escutcheon, there are nine points where symbols (known as charges) could be placed. (See the diagram below for more detail.) For a detailed description regarding the meaning of different charges, visit http://www.fleurdelis.com/meanings.htm
The development and use of heraldic symbols is governed by several important rules which are used to determine the composition of the symbols. Perhaps the most important are the Rules of Tincture. This series of rules prohibits the use of certain color combinations within an achievement. Tinctures are divided into three distinct categories, colors, metals (gold and silver), and furs (patterns).[5] The Rule of Tincture exists largely as a method of differentiating between heraldic symbols to provide visibility and contrast.
Another important feature of coats of arms is cadency: the method of distinguishing between arms belonging to members of the same family. Given that arms are generally inherited, cadency is formed by adding marks of other identifying features.[6] The following is the system utilized for the first nine sons:
- First Son – A label of three points is added to the top of the coat of arms. This label is removed upon the death of the father and the first son inherits his father’s arms of his father (known as a ‘plain coat’).
- Second Son – an upward pointed crescent
- Third Son – a five-pointed star
- Fourth Son – a Martlet (a small bird)
- Fifth Son – an annulet/ring
- Sixth Son – a fleur de lys/lily
- Seventh Son – a rose
- Eighth Son – a Moline/forked cross
- Ninth Son – a double quatrefoil (a design with four lobes, such as a four leaf clover)
Notes
For more information on the history and use of heraldic symbols, see Arthur Charles Fox-Davies’ The Art of Heraldry: An Encyclopedia of Armory, available online at https://archive.org/details/artofheraldryenc00foxd.
[1] C.A. Stothard, Monumental Effigies of Great Britain (London: Penguin, 1946).
[2] History, College of Arms, http://www.college-of-arms.gov.uk/about-us/history.
[3] Charles Boutell and Arthur Charles Fox-Davies, The Handbook to English Heraldry (London: Reeves and Turner, 1914).
[4] International Heraldry and Heralds. http://www.internationalheraldry.com/#shield.
[5] International Heraldry and Heralds, http://www.internationalheraldry.com/#tincture.
[6] International Heraldry and Heralds, http://www.internationalheraldry.com/#differencing.
Having designed my own family’s arms with various levels of puns ( my favorite being the use of the color orange and a tachibana kamon as a crest for the scientific name of the bitter or Seville orange, Citrus aurantium var. tachibana), it’s a fun part of the field of heraldry:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canting_arms
Interesting post, especially in light of an ongoing current conversation on the Dutch-Colonies Rootweb e-list over the meaning of having a coat of arms vis-a-vis one’s family being a member of royalty. Your post seems not to imply that at all, nor does Gerald’s design of his own family arms. Yet many people seem to think that if they can come up with some coat of arms for their family, it means that someplace back in history, they are descended from royalty. Your historical example is English.
About 40 years ago, my father, who was researching the Waggoner family, fell for a scam and bought a book with a Waggoner coat of arms. In many years of research, nobody’s figured out where our branch came from (the immigrant ancestor was Hans Wagner ca 1730). The book did have a coat of arms on the cover, no explanation, and lists and lists of names and addresses. At the time, I thought it might have been culled from phone books, but now that I know more, I think also from city directories. At least my dad knew he’d been had the minute he looked at the book! Fortunately, it wasn’t very expensive.
>> Given that arms are generally inherited, cadency is formed by adding marks of other identifying features.[6] The following is the system utilized for the first nine sons: <<
When I read this I wonder. When did this system (end product) start and how did it historically came to be. I know of historical examples for one or the other but not of rules. Nine different marks for nine different sons. That sounds rather theoretically, made up.
This website is pretty legit and historically accurate, as it attempts to show all the arms for each name:
Garcia